Share this page:

 Accounting Standard (AS) 15 *

(revised 2005)

Employee Benefits

[This Accounting Standard includes paragraphs set in bold italic type and plain type, which have equal authority. Paragraphs in bold italic type indicate the main principles. This Accounting Standard should be read in the context of its objective, the Preface to the Statements of Accounting Standards1and the ‘Applicability of Accounting Standards to Various Entities’ (See Appendix 1 to this Compendium).]

Objective

The objective of this Standard is to prescribe the accounting and disclosure for employee benefits. The Standard requires an enterprise to recognise:

Scope

1 This Standard should be applied by an employer in accounting for all employee benefits, except employee share-based payments 2.

2 This Standard does not deal with accounting and reporting by employee benefit plans.

3 The employee benefits to which this Standard applies include those provided:

4 Employee benefits include:

Because each category identified in (a) to (d) above has different characteristics, this Standard establishes separate requirements for each category.

5 Employee benefits include benefits provided to either employees or their spouses, children or other dependants and may be settled by payments (or the provision of goods or services) made either:

6 An employee may provide services to an enterprise on a full-time, part- time, permanent, casual or temporary basis. For the purpose of this Standard, employees include whole-time directors and other management personnel.

Definitions

7 The following terms are used in this Standard with the meanings specified:

7.1  Employee benefits are all forms of consideration given by an enterprise in exchange for service rendered by employees.

 7.2 Short-term employee benefits are employee benefits (other than termination benefits) which fall due wholly within twelve months after the end of the period in which the employees render the related service.

 7.3 Post-employment benefits are employee benefits (other than termination benefits) which are payable after the completion of employment.

 7.4 Post-employment benefit plans are formal or informal arrangements under which an enterprise provides post-employment benefits for one or more employees.

 7.5 Defined contribution plans are post-employment benefit plans under which an enterprise pays fixed contributions into a separate entity (a fund) and will have no obligation to pay further contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employee benefits relating to employee service in the current and prior periods.

 7.6 Defined benefit plans are post-employment benefit plans other than defined contribution plans.

 7.7 Multi-employer plans are defined contribution plans (other than state plans) or defined benefit plans (other than state plans) that:

 7.8 Other long-term employee benefits are employee benefits (other than post-employment benefits and termination benefits) which do not fall due wholly within twelve months after the end of the period in which the employees render the related service.

 7.9 Termination benefits are employee benefits payable as a result of either:

 7.10 Vested employee benefits are employee benefits that are not conditional on future employment.

 7.11 The present value of a defined benefit obligation is the present value, without deducting any plan assets, of expected future payments required to settle the obligation resulting from employee service in the current and prior periods.

 7.12 Current service cost is the increase in the present value of the defined benefit obligation resulting from employee service in the current period.

 7.13 Interest cost is the increase during a period in the present value of a defined benefit obligation which arises because the benefits are one period closer to settlement.

 7.14 Plan assets comprise:

 7.15 Assets held by a long-term employee benefit fund are assets (other than non-transferable financial instruments issued by the reporting enterprise) that:

 7.16 A qualifying insurance policy is an insurance policy issued by an insurer that is not a related party (as defined in AS 18, Related Party Disclosures ) of the reporting enterprise, if the proceeds of the policy:

 7.17 Fair value is the amount for which an asset could be exchanged or a liability settled between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm’s length transaction.

 7.18 The return on plan assets is interest, dividends and other revenue derived from the plan assets, together with realised and unrealised gains or losses on the plan assets, less any costs of administering the plan and less any tax payable by the plan itself.

 7.19 Actuarial gains and losses comprise:

 7.20 Past service cost is the change in the present value of the defined benefit obligation for employee service in prior periods, resulting in the current period from the introduction of, or changes to, post-employment benefits or other long-term employee benefits. Past service cost may be either positive (where benefits are introduced or improved) or negative (where existing benefits are reduced).

Short-term Employee Benefits

8 Short-term employee benefits include items such as:

9 Accounting for short-term employee benefits is generally straight- forward because no actuarial assumptions are required to measure the obligation or the cost and there is no possibility of any actuarial gain or loss. Moreover, short- term employee benefit obligations are measured on an undiscounted basis.

Recognition and Measurement

All Short-term Employee Benefits

 10 When an employee has rendered service to an enterprise during an accounting period, the enterprise should recognise the undiscounted amount of short-term employee benefits expected to be paid in exchange for that service:

Paragraphs 11, 14 and 17 explain how an enterprise should apply this requirement to short-term employee benefits in the form of compensated absences and profit-sharing and bonus plans.

Short-term Compensated Absences

11 An enterprise should recognise the expected cost of short-term employee benefits in the form of compensated absences under paragraph 10 as follows:

12 An enterprise may compensate employees for absence for various reasons including vacation, sickness and short-term disability, and maternity or paternity. Entitlement to compensated absences falls into two categories:

13 Accumulating compensated absences are those that are carried forward and can be used in future periods if the current period’s entitlement is not used in full. Accumulating compensated absences may be either vesting (in other words, employees are entitled to a cash payment for unused entitlement on leaving the enterprise) or non-vesting (when employees are not entitled to a cash payment for unused entitlement on leaving). An obligation arises as employees render service that increases their entitlement to future compensated absences. The obligation exists, and is recognised, even if the compensated absences are non-vesting, although the possibility that employees may leave before they use an accumulated non-vesting entitlement affects the measurement of that obligation.

14. An enterprise should measure the expected cost of accumulating compensated absences as the additional amount that the enterprise expects to pay as a result of the unused entitlement that has accumulated at the balance sheet date.

15 The method specified in the previous paragraph measures the obligation at the amount of the additional payments that are expected to arise solely from the fact that the benefit accumulates. In many cases, an enterprise may not need to make detailed computations to estimate that there is no material obligation for unused compensated absences. For example, a leave obligation is likely to be material only if there is a formal or informal understanding that unused leave may be taken as paid vacation.

Example Illustrating Paragraphs 14 and 15
An enterprise has 100 employees, who are each entitled to five working days of leave for each year. Unused leave may be carried forward for one calendar year. The leave is taken first out of the current year’s entitlement and then out of any balance brought forward from the previous year (a LIFO basis). At 31 December 20X4, the average unused entitlement is two days per employee. The enterprise expects, based on past experience which is expected to continue, that 92 employees will take no more than five days of leave in 20X5 and that the remaining eight employees will take an average of six and a half days each.
The enterprise expects that it will pay an additional 12 days of pay as a result of the unused entitlement that has accumulated at 31 December 20X4 (one and a half days each, for eight employees). Therefore, the enterprise recognises a liability, as at 31 December 20X4, equal to 12 days of pay.

16 Non-accumulating compensated absences do not carry forward: they lapse if the current period’s entitlement is not used in full and do not entitle employees to a cash payment for unused entitlement on leaving the enterprise. This is commonly the case for maternity or paternity leave. An enterprise recognises no liability or expense until the time of the absence, because employee service does not increase the amount of the benefit.

Provided that a Small and Medium-sized Company and Micro, Small and Medium-sized Enterprise (Levels IV, III and II non-company entities), as defined in Appendix 1 to this Compendium, may not comply with paragraphs 11 to 16 of the Standard to the extent they deal with recognition and measurement of short-term accumulating compensated absences which are non-vesting (i.e., short-term accumulating compensated absences in respect of which employees are not entitled to cash payment of unused entitlement on leaving).

Profit-sharing and Bonus Plans

17 An enterprise should recognise the expected cost of profit-sharing and bonus payments under paragraph 10 when, and only when:

A present obligation exists when, and only when, the enterprise has no realistic alternative but to make the payments.

18 Under some profit-sharing plans, employees receive a share of the profit only if they remain with the enterprise for a specified period. Such plans create an obligation as employees render service that increases the amount to be paid if they remain in service until the end of the specified period. The measurement of such obligations reflects the possibility that some employees may leave without receiving profit-sharing payments.

Example Illustrating Paragraph 18

A profit-sharing plan requires an enterprise to pay a specified proportion of its net profit for the year to employees who serve throughout the year. If no employees leave during the year, the total profit-sharing payments for the year will be 3% of net profit. The enterprise estimates that staff turnover will reduce the payments to 2.5% of net profit.

The enterprise recognises a liability and an expense of 2.5% of net profit.

19 An enterprise may have no legal obligation to pay a bonus. Nevertheless, in some cases, an enterprise has a practice of paying bonuses. In such cases also, the enterprise has an obligation because the enterprise has no realistic alternative but to pay the bonus. The measurement of the obligation reflects the possibility that some employees may leave without receiving a bonus.

20 An enterprise can make a reliable estimate of its obligation under a profit- sharing or bonus plan when, and only when:

21 An obligation under profit-sharing and bonus plans results from employee service and not from a transaction with the enterprise’s owners. Therefore, an enterprise recognises the cost of profit-sharing and bonus plans not as a distribution of net profit but as an expense.

22 If profit-sharing and bonus payments are not due wholly within twelve months after the end of the period in which the employees render the related service, those payments are other long-term employee benefits (see paragraphs 127-132).

Disclosure

23 Although this Standard does not require specific disclosures about short- term employee benefits, other Accounting Standards may require disclosures. For example, where required by AS 18, Related Party Disclosures an enterprise discloses information about employee benefits for key management personnel.

Post-employment Benefits: Defined Contribution Plans and Defined Benefit Plans

24 Post-employment benefits include:

Arrangements whereby an enterprise provides post-employment benefits are post-employment benefit plans. An enterprise applies this Standard to all such arrangements whether or not they involve the establishment of a separate entity to receive contributions and to pay benefits.

25 Post-employment benefit plans are classified as either defined contribution plans or defined benefit plans, depending on the economic substance of the plan as derived from its principal terms and conditions. Under defined contribution plans:

26 Examples of cases where an enterprise’s obligation is not limited to the amount that it agrees to contribute to the fund are when the enterprise has an obligation through:

17 Under defined benefit plans:

 28 Paragraphs 29 to 43 below deal with defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans in the context of multi-employer plans, state plans and insured benefits.

Multi-employer Plans

 29 An enterprise should classify a multi-employer plan as a defined contribution plan or a defined benefit plan under the terms of the plan (including any obligation that goes beyond the formal terms). Where a multi-employer plan is a defined benefit plan, an enterprise should:

 30 When sufficient information is not available to use defined benefit accounting for a multi-employer plan that is a defined benefit plan, an enterprise should:

31 One example of a defined benefit multi-employer plan is one where:

32 Where sufficient information is available about a multi-employer plan which is a defined benefit plan, an enterprise accounts for its proportionate share of the defined benefit obligation, plan assets and post-employment benefit cost associated with the plan in the same way as for any other defined benefit plan. However, in some cases, an enterprise may not be able to identify its share of the underlying financial position and performance of the plan with sufficient reliability for accounting purposes. This may occur if:

In those cases, an enterprise accounts for the plan as if it were a defined contribution plan and discloses the additional information required by paragraph 30.

33 Multi-employer plans are distinct from group administration plans. A group administration plan is merely an aggregation of single employer plans combined to allow participating employers to pool their assets for investment purposes and reduce investment management and administration costs, but the claims of different employers are segregated for the sole benefit of their own employees. Group administration plans pose no particular accounting problems because information is readily available to treat them in the same way as any other single employer plan and because such plans do not expose the participating enterprises to actuarial risks associated with the current and former employees of other enterprises. The definitions in this Standard require an enterprise to classify a group administration plan as a defined contribution plan or a defined benefit plan in accordance with the terms of the plan (including any obligation that goes beyond the formal terms).

34 Defined benefit plans that share risks between various enterprises under common control, for example, a parent and its subsidiaries, are not multi- employer plans.

35 In respect of such a plan, if there is a contractual agreement or stated policy for charging the net defined benefit cost for the plan as a whole to individual group enterprises, the enterprise recognises, in its separate financial statements, the net defined benefit cost so charged. If there is no such agreement or policy, the net defined benefit cost is recognised in the separate financial statements of the group enterprise that is legally the sponsoring employer for the plan. The other group enterprises recognise, in their separate financial statements, a cost equal to their contribution payable for the period.

36 AS 29, Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets requires an enterprise to recognise, or disclose information about, certain contingent liabilities. In the context of a multi-employer plan, a contingent liability may arise from, for example:

State Plans

37 An enterprise should account for a state plan in the same way as for a multi-employer plan (see paragraphs 29 and 30).

38 State plans are established by legislation to cover all enterprises (or all enterprises in a particular category, for example, a specific industry) and are operated by national or local government or by another body (for example, an autonomous agency created specifically for this purpose) which is not subject to control or influence by the reporting enterprise. Some plans established by an enterprise provide both compulsory benefits which substitute for benefits that would otherwise be covered under a state plan and additional voluntary benefits. Such plans are not state plans.

39 State plans are characterised as defined benefit or defined contribution in nature based on the enterprise’s obligation under the plan. Many state plans are funded in a manner such that contributions are set at a level that is expected to be sufficient to pay the required benefits falling due in the same period; future benefits earned during the current period will be paid out of future contributions. Nevertheless, in most state plans, the enterprise has no obligation to pay those future benefits: its only obligation is to pay the contributions as they fall due and if the enterprise ceases to employ members of the state plan, it will have no obligation to pay the benefits earned by such employees in previous years. For this reason, state plans are normally defined contribution plans. However, in the rare cases when a state plan is a defined benefit plan, an enterprise applies the treatment prescribed in paragraphs 29 and 30.

Insured Benefits

 40 An enterprise may pay insurance premiums to fund a post- employment benefit plan. The enterprise should treat such a plan as a defined contribution plan unless the enterprise will have (either directly, or indirectly through the plan) an obligation to either:

If the enterprise retains such an obligation, the enterprise should treat the plan as a defined benefit plan.

 41 The benefits insured by an insurance contract need not have a direct or automatic relationship with the enterprise’s obligation for employee benefits. Post-employment benefit plans involving insurance contracts are subject to the same distinction between accounting and funding as other funded plans.

 42 Where an enterprise funds a post-employment benefit obligation by contributing to an insurance policy under which the enterprise (either directly, indirectly through the plan, through the mechanism for setting future premiums or through a related party relationship with the insurer) retains an obligation, the payment of the premiums does not amount to a defined contribution arrangement. It follows that the enterprise:

 43 Where an insurance policy is in the name of a specified plan participant or a group of plan participants and the enterprise does not have any obligation to cover any loss on the policy, the enterprise has no obligation to pay benefits to the employees and the insurer has sole responsibility for paying the benefits. The payment of fixed premiums under such contracts is, in substance, the settlement of the employee benefit obligation, rather than an investment to meet the obligation. Consequently, the enterprise no longer has an asset or a liability. Therefore, an enterprise treats such payments as contributions to a defined contribution plan.

Post-employment Benefits: Defined Contribution Plans

 44 Accounting for defined contribution plans is straightforward because the reporting enterprise’s obligation for each period is determined by the amounts to be contributed for that period. Consequently, no actuarial assumptions are required to measure the obligation or the expense and there is no possibility of any actuarial gain or loss. Moreover, the obligations are measured on an undiscounted basis, except where they do not fall due wholly within twelve months after the end of the period in which the employees render the related service.

Recognition and Measurement

 45 When an employee has rendered service to an enterprise during a period, the enterprise should recognise the contribution payable to a defined contribution plan in exchange for that service:

 46 Where contributions to a defined contribution plan do not fall due wholly within twelve months after the end of the period in which the employees render the related service, they should be discounted using the discount rate specified in paragraph 78.

Provided that a Small and Medium-sized Company and a Micro, Small and Medium-sized Enterprise (Levels IV, III and II non-company entities), as defined in Appendix 1 to this Compendium, may not discount contributions that fall due more than 12 months after the balance sheet date.

Disclosure

 47 An enterprise should disclose the amount recognised as an expense for defined contribution plans.

 48 Where required by AS 18, Related Party Disclosures an enterprise discloses information about contributions to defined contribution plans for key management personnel.

Post-employment Benefits: Defined Benefit Plans

 49 Accounting for defined benefit plans is complex because actuarial assumptions are required to measure the obligation and the expense and there is a possibility of actuarial gains and losses. Moreover, the obligations are measured on a discounted basis because they may be settled many years after the employees render the related service. While the Standard requires that it is the responsibility of the reporting enterprise to measure the obligations under the defined benefit plans, it is recognised that for doing so the enterprise would normally use the services of a qualified actuary.

Recognition and Measurement 3

 50 Defined benefit plans may be unfunded, or they may be wholly or partly funded by contributions by an enterprise, and sometimes its employees, into an entity, or fund, that is legally separate from the reporting enterprise and from which the employee benefits are paid. The payment of funded benefits when they fall due depends not only on the financial position and the investment performance of the fund but also on an enterprise’s ability to make good any shortfall in the fund’s assets. Therefore, the enterprise is, in substance, underwriting the actuarial and investment risks associated with the plan. Consequently, the expense recognised for a defined benefit plan is not necessarily the amount of the contribution due for the period.

 51 Accounting by an enterprise for defined benefit plans involves the following steps:

Where an enterprise has more than one defined benefit plan, the enterprise applies these procedures for each material plan separately.

 52 For measuring the amounts under paragraph 51, in some cases, estimates, averages and simplified computations may provide a reliable approximation of the detailed computations.

Accounting for the Obligation under a Defined Benefit Plan

 53 An enterprise should account not only for its legal obligation under the formal terms of a defined benefit plan, but also for any other obligation that arises from the enterprise’s informal practices. Informal practices give rise to an obligation where the enterprise has no realistic alternative but to pay employee benefits. An example of such an obligation is where a change in the enterprise’s informal practices would cause unacceptable damage to its relationship with employees.

 54 The formal terms of a defined benefit plan may permit an enterprise to terminate its obligation under the plan. Nevertheless, it is usually difficult for an enterprise to cancel a plan if employees are to be retained. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, accounting for post-employment benefits assumes that an enterprise which is currently promising such benefits will continue to do so over the remaining working lives of employees.

Balance Sheet

 55 The amount recognised as a defined benefit liability should be the net total of the following amounts:

 56 The present value of the defined benefit obligation is the gross obligation, before deducting the fair value of any plan assets.

 57 An enterprise should determine the present value of defined benefit obligations and the fair value of any plan assets with sufficient regularity that the amounts recognised in the financial statements do not differ materially from the amounts that would be determined at the balance sheet date.

 58 The detailed actuarial valuation of the present value of defined benefit obligations may be made at intervals not exceeding three years. However, with a view that the amounts recognised in the financial statements do not differ materially from the amounts that would be determined at the balance sheet date, the most recent valuation is reviewed at the balance sheet date and updated to reflect any material transactions and other material changes in circumstances (including changes in interest rates) between the date of valuation and the balance sheet date. The fair value of any plan assets is determined at each balance sheet date.

 59 The amount determined under paragraph 55 may be negative (an asset). An enterprise should measure the resulting asset at the lower of:

 60 An asset may arise where a defined benefit plan has been overfunded or in certain cases where actuarial gains are recognised. An enterprise recognises an asset in such cases because:

Example Illustrating Paragraph 59
Amount in Rs.)
A defined benefit plan has the following characteristics:
A defined benefit plan has the following characteristics:
Present value of the obligation 1,100
Fair value of plan assets (1,190)
(90)
Unrecognised past service cost (70)
Negative amount determined under paragraph 55 (160)
Present value of available future refunds and reductions in future contributions 90
Limit under paragraph 59 (b) 90
Rs. 90 is less than Rs. 160. Therefore, the enterprise recognises an asset of Rs. 90 and discloses that the limit reduced the carrying amount of the asset by Rs. 70 (see paragraph 120(f)(ii)).

Statement of Profit and Loss

 61 An enterprise should recognise the net total of the following amounts in the statement of profit and loss, except to the extent that another Accounting Standard requires or permits their inclusion in the cost of an asset:

 62 Other Accounting Standards require the inclusion of certain employee benefit costs within the cost of assets such as tangible fixed assets (see AS 10, Property, Plant and Equipment). Any post-employment benefit costs included in the cost of such assets include the appropriate proportion of the components listed in paragraph 61.

Illustration

 63 Illustration I attached to the Standard illustrates describing the components of the amounts recognised in the balance sheet and statement of profit and loss in respect of defined benefit plans.

Recognition and Measurement: Present Value of Defined Benefit Obligations and Current Service Cost

 64 The ultimate cost of a defined benefit plan may be influenced by many variables, such as final salaries, employee turnover and mortality, medical cost trends and, for a funded plan, the investment earnings on the plan assets. The ultimate cost of the plan is uncertain and this uncertainty is likely to persist over a long period of time. In order to measure the present value of the post- employment benefit obligations and the related current service cost, it is necessary to:

Actuarial Valuation Method

 65 . An enterprise should use the Projected Unit Credit Method to determine the present value of its defined benefit obligations and the related current service cost and, where applicable, past service cost.

 66 The Projected Unit Credit Method (sometimes known as the accrued benefit method pro-rated on service or as the benefit/years of service method) considers each period of service as giving rise to an additional unit of benefit entitlement (see paragraphs 68-72) and measures each unit separately to build up the final obligation (see paragraphs 73-91).

 67 An enterprise discounts the whole of a post-employment benefit obligation, even if part of the obligation falls due within twelve months of the balance sheet date.

Example Illustrating Paragraph 66

A lump sum benefit, equal to 1% of final salary for each year of service, is payable on termination of service. The salary in year 1 is Rs. 10,000 and is assumed to increase at 7% (compound) each year resulting in Rs. 13,100 at the end of year 5. The discount rate used is 10% per annum. The following table shows how the obligation builds up for an employee who is expected to leave at the end of year 5, assuming that there are no changes in actuarial assumptions. For simplicity, this example ignores the additional adjustment needed to reflect the probability that the employee may leave the enterprise at an earlier or later date.

(Amount in Rs.)

Year

1

2

3

4

5

 

Benefit attributed to:

- prior years

0

131

262

393

524

- current year (1% of final salary)

131

131

131

131

131

- current and prior years

131

262

393

524

655

Opening Obligation (see note 1)

 

-

 

89

 

196

 

324

 

476

Interest at 10%

-

9

20

33

48

Current Service Cost (see note 2)

89

98

108

19

131

Closing Obligation (see note 3)

89

196

324

476

655

Notes:

1 The Opening Obligation is the present value of benefit attributed to prior years.

2 The Current Service Cost is the present value of benefit attributed to the current year.

3 The Closing Obligation is the present value of benefit attributed to current and prior years.

Attributing Benefit to Periods of Service

 68 In determining the present value of its defined benefit obligations and the related current service cost and, where applicable, past service cost, an enterprise should attribute benefit to periods of service under the plan’s benefit formula. However, if an employee’s service in later years will lead to a materially higher level of benefit than in earlier years, an enterprise should attribute benefit on a straight-line basis from:

 69 The Projected Unit Credit Method requires an enterprise to attribute benefit to the current period (in order to determine current service cost) and the current and prior periods (in order to determine the present value of defined benefit obligations). An enterprise attributes benefit to periods in which the obligation to provide post-employment benefits arises. That obligation arises as employees render services in return for post-employment benefits which an enterprise expects to pay in future reporting periods. Actuarial techniques allow an enterprise to measure that obligation with sufficient reliability to justify recognition of a liability.

Examples Illustrating Paragraph 69

1 A defined benefit plan provides a lump-sum benefit of Rs. 100 payable on retirement for each year of service.

A benefit of Rs. 100 is attributed to each year. The current service cost is the present value of Rs. 100. The present value of the defined benefit obligation is the present value of Rs. 100, multiplied by the number of years of service up to the balance sheet date.

If the benefit is payable immediately when the employee leaves the enterprise, the current service cost and the present value of the defined benefit obligation reflect the date at which the employee is expected to leave. Thus, because of the effect of discounting, they are less than the amounts that would be determined if the employee left at the balance sheet date.

2 A plan provides a monthly pension of 0.2% of final salary for each year of service. The pension is payable from the age of 60.

Benefit equal to the present value, at the expected retirement date, of a monthly pension of 0.2% of the estimated final salary payable from the expected retirement date until the expected date of death is attributed to each year of service. The current service cost is the present value of that benefit. The present value of the defined benefit obligation is the present value of monthly pension payments of 0.2% of final salary, multiplied by the number of years of service up to the balance sheet date. The current service cost and the present value of the defined benefit obligation are discounted because pension payments begin at the age of 60.

 70. Employee service gives rise to an obligation under a defined benefit plan even if the benefits are conditional on future employment (in other words they are not vested). Employee service before the vesting date gives rise to an obligation because, at each successive balance sheet date, the amount of future service that an employee will have to render before becoming entitled to the benefit is reduced. In measuring its defined benefit obligation, an enterprise considers the probability that some employees may not satisfy any vesting requirements. Similarly, although certain post- employment benefits, for example, post-employment medical benefits, become payable only if a specified event occurs when an employee is no longer employed, an obligation is created when the employee renders service that will provide entitlement to the benefit if the specified event occurs. The probability that the specified event will occur affects the measurement of the obligation, but does not determine whether the obligation exists.

Examples Illustrating Paragraph 70

1 A plan pays a benefit of Rs. 100 for each year of service. The benefits vest after ten years of service.

A benefit of Rs. 100 is attributed to each year. In each of the first ten years, the current service cost and the present value of the obligation reflect the probability that the employee may not complete ten years of service.

2 A plan pays a benefit of Rs. 100 for each year of service, excluding service before the age of 25. The benefits vest immediately.

No benefit is attributed to service before the age of 25 because service before that date does not lead to benefits (conditional or unconditional). A benefit of Rs. 100 is attributed to each subsequent year.

 71. The obligation increases until the date when further service by the employee will lead to no material amount of further benefits. Therefore, all benefit is attributed to periods ending on or before that date. Benefit is attributed to individual accounting periods under the plan’s benefit formula. However, if an employee’s service in later years will lead to a materially higher level of benefit than in earlier years, an enterprise attributes benefit on a straight-line basis until the date when further service by the employee will lead to no material amount of further benefits. That is because the employee’s service throughout the entire period will ultimately lead to benefit at that higher level.

Examples Illustrating Paragraph 71

1 A plan pays a lump-sum benefit of Rs. 1,000 that vests after ten years of service. The plan provides no further benefit for subsequent service.

A benefit of Rs. 100 (Rs. 1,000 divided by ten) is attributed to each of the first ten years. The current service cost in each of the first ten years reflects the probability that the employee may not complete ten years of service. No benefit is attributed to subsequent years.

2 A plan pays a lump-sum retirement benefit of Rs. 2,000 to all employees who are still employed at the age of 50 after twenty years of service, or who are still employed at the age of 60, regardless of their length of service.

For employees who join before the age of 30, service first leads to benefits under the plan at the age of 30 (an employee could leave at the age of 25 and return at the age of 28, with no effect on the amount or timing of benefits). Those benefits are conditional on further service. Also, service beyond the age of 50 will lead to no material amount of further benefits. For these employees, the enterprise attributes benefit of Rs. 100 (Rs. 2,000 divided by 20) to each year from the age of 30 to the age of 50.

For employees who join between the ages of 30 and 40, service beyond twenty years will lead to no material amount of further benefits. For these employees, the enterprise attributes benefit of Rs. 100 (Rs. 2,000 divided by 20) to each of the first twenty years.

For an employee who joins at the age of 50, service beyond ten years will lead to no material amount of further benefits. For this employee, the enterprise attributes benefit of Rs. 200 (Rs. 2,000 divided by 10) to each of the first ten years.

For all employees, the current service cost and the present value of the obligation reflect the probability that the employee may not complete the necessary period of service.

3 A post-employment medical plan reimburses 40% of an employee’s post- employment medical costs if the employee leaves after more than ten and less than twenty years of service and 50% of those costs if the employee leaves after twenty or more years of service.

Under the plan’s benefit formula, the enterprise attributes 4% of the present value of the expected medical costs (40% divided by ten) to each of the first ten years and 1% (10% divided by ten) to each of the second ten years. The current service cost in each year reflects the probability that the employee may not complete the necessary period of service to earn part or all of the benefits. For employees expected to leave within ten years, no benefit is attributed.

4 A post-employment medical plan reimburses 10% of an employee’s post- employment medical costs if the employee leaves after more than ten and less than twenty years of service and 50% of those costs if the employee leaves after twenty or more years of service.

Service in later years will lead to a materially higher level of benefit than in earlier years. Therefore, for employees expected to leave after twenty or more years, the enterprise attributes benefit on a straight-line basis under paragraph 69. Service beyond twenty years will lead to no material amount of further benefits. Therefore, the benefit attributed to each of the first twenty years is 2.5% of the present value of the expected medical costs (50% divided by twenty).

For employees expected to leave between ten and twenty years, the benefit attributed to each of the first ten years is 1% of the present value of the expected medical costs. For these employees, no benefit is attributed to service between the end of the tenth year and the estimated date of leaving.

For employees expected to leave within ten years, no benefit is attributed.

 72 Where the amount of a benefit is a constant proportion of final salary for each year of service, future salary increases will affect the amount required to settle the obligation that exists for service before the balance sheet date, but do not create an additional obligation. Therefore:

Example Illustrating Paragraph 72

Employees are entitled to a benefit of 3% of final salary for each year of service before the age of 55.

Benefit of 3% of estimated final salary is attributed to each year up to the age of55. This is the date when further service by the employee will lead to no material amount of further benefits under the plan. No benefit is attributed to service after that age.

Actuarial Assumptions

 73. Actuarial assumptions comprising demographic assumptions and financial assumptions should be unbiased and mutually compatible. Financial assumptions should be based on market expectations, at the balance sheet date, for the period over which the obligations are to be settled.

 74 Actuarial assumptions are an enterprise’s best estimates of the variables that will determine the ultimate cost of providing post-employment benefits. Actuarial assumptions comprise:

 75 Actuarial assumptions are unbiased if they are neither imprudent nor excessively conservative.

 76 Actuarial assumptions are mutually compatible if they reflect the economic relationships between factors such as inflation, rates of salary increase, the return on plan assets and discount rates. For example, all assumptions which depend on a particular inflation level (such as assumptions about interest rates and salary and benefit increases) in any given future period assume the same inflation level in that period.

 77 An enterprise determines the discount rate and other financial assumptions in nominal (stated) terms, unless estimates in real (inflation- adjusted) terms are more reliable, for example, where the benefit is index- linked and there is a deep market in index-linked bonds of the same currency and term.

Actuarial Assumptions: Discount Rate

 78. The rate used to discount post-employment benefit obligations (both funded and unfunded) should be determined by reference to market yields at the balance sheet date on government bonds. The currency and term of the government bonds should be consistent with the currency and estimated term of the post-employment benefit obligations.

 79 One actuarial assumption which has a material effect is the discount rate. The discount rate reflects the time value of money but not the actuarial or investment risk. Furthermore, the discount rate does not reflect the enterprise- specific credit risk borne by the enterprise’s creditors, nor does it reflect the risk that future experience may differ from actuarial assumptions.

 80 The discount rate reflects the estimated timing of benefit payments. In practice, an enterprise often achieves this by applying a single weighted average discount rate that reflects the estimated timing and amount of benefit payments and the currency in which the benefits are to be paid.

 81 In some cases, there may be no government bonds with a sufficiently long maturity to match the estimated maturity of all the benefit payments. In such cases, an enterprise uses current market rates of the appropriate term to discount shorter term payments, and estimates the discount rate for longer maturities by extrapolating current market rates along the yield curve. The total present value of a defined benefit obligation is unlikely to be particularly sensitive to the discount rate applied to the portion of benefits that is payable beyond the final maturity of the available government bonds.

 82 Interest cost is computed by multiplying the discount rate as determined at the start of the period by the present value of the defined benefit obligation throughout that period, taking account of any material changes in the obligation. The present value of the obligation will differ from the liability recognised in the balance sheet because the liability is recognised after deducting the fair value of any plan assets and because some past service cost are not recognised immediately. [Illustration I attached to the Standard illustrates the computation of interest cost, among other things]

Actuarial Assumptions: Salaries, Benefits and Medical Costs

 83 Post-employment benefit obligations should be measured on a basis that reflects:

 84 Estimates of future salary increases take account of inflation, seniority, promotion and other relevant factors, such as supply and demand in the employment market.

 85 If the formal terms of a plan (or an obligation that goes beyond those terms) require an enterprise to change benefits in future periods, the measurement of the obligation reflects those changes. This is the case when, for example:

 86 Actuarial assumptions do not reflect future benefit changes that are not set out in the formal terms of the plan (or an obligation that goes beyond those terms) at the balance sheet date. Such changes will result in:

 87 Some post-employment benefits are linked to variables such as the level of state retirement benefits or state medical care. The measurement of such benefits reflects expected changes in such variables, based on past history and other reliable evidence.

 88. Assumptions about medical costs should take account of estimated future changes in the cost of medical services, resulting from both inflation and specific changes in medical costs.

 89 Measurement of post-employment medical benefits requires assumptions about the level and frequency of future claims and the cost of meeting those claims. An enterprise estimates future medical costs on the basis of historical data about the enterprise’s own experience, supplemented where necessary by historical data from other enterprises, insurance companies, medical providers or other sources. Estimates of future medical costs consider the effect of technological advances, changes in health care utilisation or delivery patterns and changes in the health status of plan participants.

 90 The level and frequency of claims is particularly sensitive to the age, health status and sex of employees (and their dependants) and may be sensitive to other factors such as geographical location. Therefore, historical data is adjusted to the extent that the demographic mix of the population differs from that of the population used as a basis for the historical data. It is also adjusted where there is reliable evidence that historical trends will not continue.

 91 Some post-employment health care plans require employees to contribute to the medical costs covered by the plan. Estimates of future medical costs take account of any such contributions, based on the terms of the plan at the balance sheet date (or based on any obligation that goes beyond those terms). Changes in those employee contributions result in past service cost or, where applicable, curtailments. The cost of meeting claims may be reduced by benefits from state or other medical providers (see paragraphs 83(c) and 87).

Actuarial Gains and Losses

 92. Actuarial gains and losses should be recognised immediately in the statement of profit and loss as income or expense (see paragraph 61).

 92A. Paragraph 145(b)(iii) explains the need to consider any unrecognised part of the transitional liability in accounting for subsequent actuarial gains.

 93 Actuarial gains and losses may result from increases or decreases in either the present value of a defined benefit obligation or the fair value of any related plan assets. Causes of actuarial gains and losses include, for example:

Past Service Cost

 94. In measuring its defined benefit liability under paragraph 55, an enterprise should recognise past service cost as an expense on a straight- line basis over the average period until the benefits become vested. To the extent that the benefits are already vested immediately following the introduction of, or changes to, a defined benefit plan, an enterprise should recognise past service cost immediately.

 95 Past service cost arises when an enterprise introduces a defined benefit plan or changes the benefits payable under an existing defined benefit plan. Such changes are in return for employee service over the period until the benefits concerned are vested. Therefore, past service cost is recognised over that period, regardless of the fact that the cost refers to employee service in previous periods. Past service cost is measured as the change in the liability resulting from the amendment (see paragraph 65).

Example Illustrating Paragraph 95

An enterprise operates a pension plan that provides a pension of 2% of final salary for each year of service. The benefits become vested after five years of service. On 1 January 20X5 the enterprise improves the pension to 2.5% of final salary for each year of service starting from 1 January 20X1. At the date of the improvement, the present value of the additional benefits for service from 1 January 20X1 to 1 January 20X5 is as follows:

Employees with more than five year's service at 1/1/X5 Rs.150
Employees with less than five year's service at 1/1/X5 (average period until vesting: three years) Rs. 120
Rs. 270
The enterprise recognises Rs. 150 immediately because those benefits are already vested. The enterprise recognises Rs. 120 on a straight-line basis over three years from 1 January 20X5.

 96 Past service cost excludes:

 97 An enterprise establishes the amortisation schedule for past service cost when the benefits are introduced or changed. It would be impracticable to maintain the detailed records needed to identify and implement subsequent changes in that amortisation schedule. Moreover, the effect is likely to be material only where there is a curtailment or settlement. Therefore, an enterprise amends the amortisation schedule for past service cost only if there is a curtailment or settlement.

 98 Where an enterprise reduces benefits payable under an existing defined benefit plan, the resulting reduction in the defined benefit liability is recognised as (negative) past service cost over the average period until the reduced portion of the benefits becomes vested.

 99 Where an enterprise reduces certain benefits payable under an existing defined benefit plan and, at the same time, increases other benefits payable under the plan for the same employees, the enterprise treats the change as a single net change.

Recognition and Measurement: Plan Assets

Fair Value of Plan Assets

 100 The fair value of any plan assets is deducted in determining the amount recognised in the balance sheet under paragraph 55. When no market price is available, the fair value of plan assets is estimated; for example, by discounting expected future cash flows using a discount rate that reflects both the risk associated with the plan assets and the maturity or expected disposal date of those assets (or, if they have no maturity, the expected period until the settlement of the related obligation).

 101 Plan assets exclude unpaid contributions due from the reporting enterprise to the fund, as well as any non-transferable financial instruments issued by the enterprise and held by the fund. Plan assets are reduced by any liabilities of the fund that do not relate to employee benefits, for example, trade and other payables and liabilities resulting from derivative financial instruments.

 102 Where plan assets include qualifying insurance policies that exactly match the amount and timing of some or all of the benefits payable under the plan, the fair value of those insurance policies is deemed to be the present value of the related obligations, as described in paragraph 55 (subject to any reduction required if the amounts receivable under the insurance policies are not recoverable in full).

Reimbursements

 103. When, and only when, it is virtually certain that another party will reimburse some or all of the expenditure required to settle a defined benefit obligation, an enterprise should recognise its right to reimbursement as a separate asset. The enterprise should measure the asset at fair value. In all other respects, an enterprise should treat that asset in the same way as plan assets. In the statement of profit and loss, the expense relating to a defined benefit plan may be presented net of the amount recognised for a reimbursement.

 104 Sometimes, an enterprise is able to look to another party, such as an insurer, to pay part or all of the expenditure required to settle a defined benefit obligation. Qualifying insurance policies, as defined in paragraph 7, are plan assets. An enterprise accounts for qualifying insurance policies in the same way as for all other plan assets and paragraph 103 does not apply (see paragraphs 40-43 and 102).

 105 When an insurance policy is not a qualifying insurance policy, that insurance policy is not a plan asset. Paragraph 103 deals with such cases: the enterprise recognises its right to reimbursement under the insurance policy as a separate asset, rather than as a deduction in determining the defined benefit liability recognised under paragraph 55; in all other respects, including for determination of the fair value, the enterprise treats that asset in the same way as plan assets. Paragraph 120(f)(iii) requires the enterprise to disclose a brief description of the link between the reimbursement right and the related obligation.

Example Illustrating Paragraphs 103-105
(Amount in Rs.)
Liability recognised in balance sheet being the present value of obligation 1,258
Rights under insurance policies that exactly match the amount and timing of some of the benefits payable under the plan
Those benefits have a present value of Rs. 1,092 Rs. 1,092

 106 If the right to reimbursement arises under an insurance policy that exactly matches the amount and timing of some or all of the benefits payable under a defined benefit plan, the fair value of the reimbursement right is deemed to be the present value of the related obligation, as described in paragraph 55 (subject to any reduction required if the reimbursement is not recoverable in full).

Return on Plan Assets

 107. The expected return on plan assets is a component of the expense recognised in the statement of profit and loss. The difference between the expected return on plan assets and the actual return on plan assets is an actuarial gain or loss.

 108The expected return on plan assets is based on market expectations, at the beginning of the period, for returns over the entire life of the related obligation. The expected return on plan assets reflects changes in the fair value of plan assets held during the period as a result of actual contributions paid into the fund and actual benefits paid out of the fund.

 109 In determining the expected and actual return on plan assets, an enterprise deducts expected administration costs, other than those included in the actuarial assumptions used to measure the obligation.

Example Illustrating Paragraph 108
At 1 January 20X1, the fair value of plan assets was Rs. 10,000. On 30 June 20X1, the plan paid benefits of Rs. 1,900 and received contributions of Rs. 4,900. At 31 December 20X1, the fair value of plan assets was Rs. 15,000 and the present value of the defined benefit obligation was Rs. 14,792. Actuarial losses on the obligation for 20X1 were Rs. 60.
At 1 January 20X1, the reporting enterprise made the following estimates, based on market prices at that date:
% Interest and dividend income, after tax payable by the fund 9.25
Realised and unrealised gains on plan assets (after tax) 2.00
Administration costs (1.00)
Expected rate of return 10.25
For 20X1, the expected and actual return on plan assets are as follows:
(Amount in Rs.)
Return on Rs. 10,000 held for 12 months at 10.25% 1,025
Return on Rs. 3,000 held for six months at 5% (equivalent to 10.25% annually, compounded every six months) 150
Expected return on plan assets for 20X1 1,175
Fair value of plan assets at 31 December 20X1 15,000
Less fair value of plan assets at 1 January 20X1 (10,000)
Less contributions received (4,900)
Add benefits paid 1,900
Actual return on plan assets 2,000
The difference between the expected return on plan assets (Rs. 1,175) and the actual return on plan assets (Rs. 2,000) is an actuarial gain of Rs. 825. Therefore, the net actuarial gain of Rs. 765 (Rs. 825 - Rs. 60 (actuarial loss on the obligation)) would be recognised in the statement of profit and loss.

The expected return on plan assets for 20X2 will be based on market expectations at 1/1/X2 for returns over the entire life of the obligation.

Curtailments and Settlements

 110 An enterprise should recognise gains or losses on the curtailment or settlement of a defined benefit plan when the curtailment or settlement occurs. The gain or loss on a curtailment or settlement should comprise:

 111 Before determining the effect of a curtailment or settlement, an enterprise should remeasure the obligation (and the related plan assets, if any) using current actuarial assumptions (including current market interest rates and other current market prices).

 112 A curtailment occurs when an enterprise either:

A curtailment may arise from an isolated event, such as the closing of a plant, discontinuance of an operation or termination or suspension of a plan. An event is material enough to qualify as a curtailment if the recognition of a curtailment gain or loss would have a material effect on the financial statements. Curtailments are often linked with a restructuring. Therefore, an enterprise accounts for a curtailment at the same time as for a related restructuring.

 113 A settlement occurs when an enterprise enters into a transaction that eliminates all further obligations for part or all of the benefits provided under a defined benefit plan, for example, when a lump-sum cash payment is made to, or on behalf of, plan participants in exchange for their rights to receive specified post-employment benefits.

 114 In some cases, an enterprise acquires an insurance policy to fund some or all of the employee benefits relating to employee service in the current and prior periods. The acquisition of such a policy is not a settlement if the enterprise retains an obligation (see paragraph 40) to pay further amounts if the insurer does not pay the employee benefits specified in the insurance policy. Paragraphs 103-106 deal with the recognition and measurement of reimbursement rights under insurance policies that are not plan assets.

 115 A settlement occurs together with a curtailment if a plan is terminated such that the obligation is settled and the plan ceases to exist. However, the termination of a plan is not a curtailment or settlement if the plan is replaced by a new plan that offers benefits that are, in substance, identical.

 116 Where a curtailment relates only to some of the employees covered by a plan, or where only part of an obligation is settled, the gain or loss includes a proportionate share of the previously unrecognised past service cost (and of transitional amounts remaining unrecognised under paragraph 145(b)). The proportionate share is determined on the basis of the present value of the obligations before and after the curtailment or settlement, unless another basis is more rational in the circumstances.

Example Illustrating Paragraph 116

An enterprise discontinues a business segment and employees of the discontinued segment will earn no further benefits. This is a curtailment without a settlement. Using current actuarial assumptions (including current market interest rates and other current market prices) immediately before the curtailment, the enterprise has a defined benefit obligation with a net present value of Rs. 1,000 and plan assets with a fair value of Rs. 820 and unrecognised past service cost of Rs. 50. The enterprise had first adopted this Standard one year before. This increased the net liability by Rs. 100, which the enterprise chose to recognise over five years (see paragraph 145(b)). The curtailment reduces the net present value of the obligation by Rs. 100 to Rs. 900.

Of the previously unrecognised past service cost and transitional amounts, 10% (Rs. 100/Rs. 1000) relates to the part of the obligation that was eliminated through the curtailment. Therefore, the effect of the curtailment is as follows:

Amount in Rs.)
Before curtailment Curtailment gain After curtailment
Net present value of obligation 1,000 (100) 900
Fair value of plan assets (820) - (820)
180 (100) 80
Unrecognised past service cost (50) 5 (45)
Unrecognised transitional amount (100x4/5) (80) 8 (72)
Net liability recognised in balance sheet (50) (87) (37)
An asset of Rs. 37 will be recognised (it is assumed that the amount under paragraph 59(b) is higher than Rs. 37)

Provided that a Small and Medium-sized Company and a Small and Medium-sized Enterprise (Levels III and II non-company entities), as defined in Appendix I to this Compendium, whose average number of persons employed during the year is 50 or more, may not apply the recognition and measurement principles laid down in paragraphs 50 to 116 in respect of accounting for defined benefit plans. However, such companies/enterprises should actuarially determine and provide for the accrued liability in respect of defined benefit plans as follows:

Provided further that a Small and Medium-sized Enterprise (Levels III and II non-company entities), as defined in Appendix 1 to this Compendium, whose average number of persons employed during the year is less than 50 and Micro Enterprises (Level IV Non-company entities) may not apply the recognition and measurement principles as laid down in paragraphs 50 to 116 in respect of accounting for defined benefit plans. However, such enterprises may calculate and account for the accrued liability under the defined benefit plans by reference to some other rational method, e.g., a method based on the assumption that such benefits are payable to all employees at the end of the accounting year.

Presentation

Offset

 117. An enterprise should offset an asset relating to one plan against a liability relating to another plan when, and only when, the enterprise:

Financial Components of Post-employment Benefit Costs

 118. This Standard does not specify whether an enterprise should present current service cost, interest cost and the expected return on plan assets as components of a single item of income or expense on the face of the statement of profit and loss.

Provided that a Small and Medium-sized company and a Micro, Small and Medium-sized Enterprise (Levels IV, III and II non-company entities), as defined in Appendix 1 to this Compendium, may not apply the presentation requirements laid down in paragraphs 117 to 118 of the Standard in respect of accounting for defined benefit plans.

Disclosure

 119 An enterprise should disclose information that enables users of financial statements to evaluate the nature of its defined benefit plans and the financial effects of changes in those plans during the period.

 120 An enterprise should disclose the following information about defined benefit plans:

 121 Paragraph 120(b) requires a general description of the type of plan. Such a description distinguishes, for example, flat salary pension plans from final salary pension plans and from post-employment medical plans. The description of the plan should include informal practices that give rise to other obligations included in the measurement of the defined benefit obligation in accordance with paragraph 53. Further detail is not required.

 122 When an enterprise has more than one defined benefit plan, disclosures may be made in total, separately for each plan, or in such groupings as are considered to be the most useful. It may be useful to distinguish groupings by criteria such as the following:

When an enterprise provides disclosures in total for a grouping of plans, such disclosures are provided in the form of weighted averages or of relatively narrow ranges.

 123 Paragraph 30 requires additional disclosures about multi-employer defined benefit plans that are treated as if they were defined contribution plans.

 124 Where required by AS 18, Related Party Disclosures, an enterprise discloses information about:

 125 Where required by AS 29, Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets an enterprise discloses information about contingent liabilities arising from post-employment benefit obligations.

Illustrative Disclosures

 126 Illustration II attached to the Standard contains illustrative disclosures.

Provided that a Small and Medium-sized Company and a Micro, Small and Medium-sized Enterprise (Levels IV, III and II non-company entities), as defined in Appendix 1 to this Compendium, may not apply the disclosure requirements laid down in paragraphs 119 to 123 of the Standard in respect of accounting for defined benefit plans. However, such company/ enterprise, except a Small and Medium-sized Enterprise (Levels III and II non-company entities) whose average number of persons employed during the year are less than 50 and Micro Enterprise (Level IV non-company entities), should disclose actuarial assumptions as per paragraph 120(l) of the Standard.

Other Long-term Employee Benefits

 127 Other long-term employee benefits include, for example:

 128 In case of other long-term employee benefits, the introduction of, or changes to, other long-term employee benefits rarely causes a material amount of past service cost. For this reason, this Standard requires a simplified method of accounting for other long-term employee benefits. This method differs from the accounting required for post-employment benefits insofar as that all past service cost is recognised immediately.

Recognition and Measurement

 129 The amount recognised as a liability for other long-term employee benefits should be the net total of the following amounts:

In measuring the liability, an enterprise should apply paragraphs 49-91, excluding paragraphs 55 and 61. An enterprise should apply paragraph 103 in recognising and measuring any reimbursement right.

 130 For other long-term employee benefits, an enterprise should recognise the net total of the following amounts as expense or (subject to paragraph 59) income, except to the extent that another Accounting Standard requires or permits their inclusion in the cost of an asset:

 131 One form of other long-term employee benefit is long-term disability benefit. If the level of benefit depends on the length of service, an obligation arises when the service is rendered. Measurement of that obligation reflects the probability that payment will be required and the length of time for which payment is expected to be made. If the level of benefit is the same for any disabled employee regardless of years of service, the expected cost of those benefits is recognised when an event occurs that causes a long-term disability.

Provided that a Small and Medium-sized Company and a Small and Medium-sized Enterprise (Levels III and II non-company entities), as defined in Appendix I to this Compendium, whose average number of persons employed during the year is 50 or more, may not apply the recognition and measurement principles laid down in paragraphs 129 to 131 in respect of accounting for other long-term employee benefits. However, such companies/ enterprises should actuarially determine and provide for accrued liability in respect of other long-term employee benefits as follows:

Provided further that a Small and Medium-sized Enterprise (Levels II and III non-corporate entities), as defined in Appendix I to this Compendium, whose average number of persons employed during the year is less than 50 and Micro Enterprises (Level IV Non-company entities) may not apply the recognition and measurement principles as laid down in paragraphs 129 to 131 in respect of accounting for other long-term employee benefits. However, such enterprises may calculate and account for the accrued liability under the other long-term employee benefits by reference to some other rational method, e.g., a method based on the assumption that such benefits are payable to all employees at the end of the accounting year.

Disclosure

 132 Although this Standard does not require specific disclosures about other long-term employee benefits, other Accounting Standards may require disclosures, for example, where the expense resulting from such benefits is of such size, nature or incidence that its disclosure is relevant to explain the performance of the enterprise for the period (see AS 5, Net Profit or Loss for the Period, Prior Period Items and Changes in Accounting Policies). Where required by AS 18 Related Party Disclosures an enterprise discloses information about other long- term employee benefits for key management personnel.

Termination Benefits

 133 This Standard deals with termination benefits separately from other employee benefits because the event which gives rise to an obligation is the termination rather than employee service.

Recognition

 134 An enterprise should recognise termination benefits as a liability and an expense when, and only when:

 135 An enterprise may be committed, by legislation, by contractual or other agreements with employees or their representatives or by an obligation based on business practice, custom or a desire to act equitably, to make payments (or provide other benefits) to employees when it terminates their employment. Such payments are termination benefits. Termination benefits are typically lump-sum payments, but sometimes also include:

 136 Some employee benefits are payable regardless of the reason for the employee’s departure. The payment of such benefits is certain (subject to any vesting or minimum service requirements) but the timing of their payment is uncertain. Although such benefits may be described as termination indemnities, or termination gratuities, they are post-employment benefits, rather than termination benefits and an enterprise accounts for them as post- employment benefits. Some enterprises provide a lower level of benefit for voluntary termination at the request of the employee (in substance, a post- employment benefit) than for involuntary termination at the request of the enterprise. The additional benefit payable on involuntary termination is a termination benefit.

 137 Termination benefits are recognised as an expense immediately.

 138 Where an enterprise recognises termination benefits, the enterprise may also have to account for a curtailment of retirement benefits or other employee benefits (see paragraph 110).

Measurement

 139. Where termination benefits fall due more than 12 months after the balance sheet date, they should be discounted using the discount rate specified in paragraph 78.

Provided that a Small and Medium-sized Company and a Micro, Small and Medium-sized Enterprise (Levels IV, III and II non-company entities), as defined in Appendix I to this Compendium, may not discount amounts that fall due more than 12 months after the balance sheet date.

Disclosure

 140 Where there is uncertainty about the number of employees who will accept an offer of termination benefits, a contingent liability exists. As required by AS 29, Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets an enterprise discloses information about the contingent liability unless the possibility of an outflow in settlement is remote.

 141 As required by AS 5, Net Profit or Loss for the Period, Prior Period Items and Changes in Accounting Policies an enterprise discloses the nature and amount of an expense if it is of such size, nature or incidence that its disclosure is relevant to explain the performance of the enterprise for the period. Termination benefits may result in an expense needing disclosure in order to comply with this requirement.

 142 Where required by AS 18, Related Party Disclosures an enterprise discloses information about termination benefits for key management personnel.

Transitional Provisions4

 142A. An enterprise may disclose the amounts required by paragraph 120(n) as the amounts are determined for each accounting period prospectively from the date the enterprise first adopts this Standard.

Employee Benefits other than Defined Benefit Plans and Termination Benefits

 143 Where an enterprise first adopts this Standard for employee benefits, the difference (as adjusted by any related tax expense) between the liability in respect of employee benefits other than defined benefit plans and termination benefits, as per this Standard, existing on the date of adopting this Standard and the liability that would have been recognised at the same date, as per the pre-revised AS 15 , should be adjusted against opening balance of revenue reserves and surplus.

Defined Benefit Plans

 144 On first adopting this Standard, an enterprise should determine its transitional liability for defined benefit plans at that date as:

 145 If the transitional liability is more than the liability that would have been recognised at the same date as per the pre-revised AS 15, the enterprise should make an irrevocable choice to recognise that increase as part of its defined benefit liability under paragraph 55:

If the transitional liability is less than the liability that would have been recognised at the same date as per the pre-revised AS 15, the enterprise should recognise that decrease immediately as an adjustment against the opening balance of revenue reserves and surplus.

Example Illustrating Paragraphs 144 and 145
At 31st March 20X7, an enterprise's balance sheet includes a pension liability of Rs. 100, recognised as per the pre-revised AS 15 issued by the ICAI in 1995. The enterprise adopts the Standard as of 1 st April 20X7, when the present value of the obligation under the Standard is Rs. 1,300 and the fair value of plan assets is Rs. 1,000. On 1 st April 20X1, the enterprise had improved pensions (cost for non-vested benefits: Rs. 160; and average remaining period at that date until vesting: 10 years).
(Amount in Rs.)
The transitional effect is as follows:
Present value of the obligation 1,300
Fair value of plan assets (1,000)
Less: past service cost to be rinecognised later periods (160 x 4/10) (64)
Transitional liability 236
Liability already recognised 100
Increase in liability 136
An enterprise may choose to recognise the increase in liability (as adjusted by any related tax expense) either immediately as an adjustment against the opening balance of revenue reserves and surplus as on 1 April 20X7 or as an expense on straight line basis over up to five years from that date. The choice is irrevocable.
At 31 March 20X8, the present value of the obligation under the Standard is Rs. 1,400 and the fair value of plan assets is Rs. 1,050. Net cumulative unrecognised actuarial gains since the date of adopting the Standard are Rs. 120. The enterprise is required, as per paragraph 92, to recognise all actuarial gains and losses immediately.
(Amount in Rs.)
The effect of the limit in paragraph 145 (b) (iii) is as follows:
Net unrecognised actuarial gain
120
Unrecognised part of the transitional liability (136 x 4/5)
(If the enterprise adopts the policy of recognising it over 5 years)
109
Maximum gain to be recognised 11

Termination Benefits

146. This Standard requires immediate expensing of expenditure on termination benefits (including expenditure incurred on voluntary retirement scheme (VRS)). However, where an enterprise incurs expenditure on termination benefits on or before 31 st March, 2009, the enterprise may choose to follow the accounting policy of deferring such expenditure for amortisation over its pay- back period. However, the expenditure so deferred cannot be carried forward to accounting periods commencing on or after 1 st April, 2010.

Illustration I

Illustration

This illustration is illustrative only and does not form part of the Standard. The purpose of this illustration is to illustrate the application of the Standard to assist in clarifying its meaning. Extracts from statements of profit and loss and balance sheets are provided to show the effects of the transactions described below. These extracts do not necessarily conform with all the disclosure and presentation requirements of other Accounting Standards.

Background Information

The following information is given about a funded defined benefit plan. To keep interest computations simple, all transactions are assumed to occur at the year end. The present value of the obligation and the fair value of the plan assets were both Rs. 1,000 at 1 April, 20X4.

(Amount in Rs.)
20X4-X5 20X5-X6 20X6-X7
Discount rate at start of year
Expected rate of return on plan
10.0% 9.0% 8.0%
assets at start of year 12.0% 11.1% 10.3%
Current service cost 130 140 150
Benefits paid 150 180 190
Contributions paid 90 100 110
Present value of obligation at 31 March 1,141 1,197 1,295
Fair value of plan assets at 31 March 1,092 1,109 1,093
Expected average remaining working lives of employees (years 10 10 10

In 20X5-X6, the plan was amended to provide additional benefits with effect from 1 April 20X5. The present value as at 1 April 20X5 of additional benefits for employee service before 1 April 20X5 was Rs. 50 for vested benefits and Rs. 30 for non-vested benefits. As at 1 April 20X5, the enterprise estimated that the average period until the non-vested benefits would become vested was three years; the past service cost arising from additional non-vested benefits is therefore recognised on a straight-line basis over three years. The past service cost arising from additional vested benefits is recognised immediately (paragraph 94 of the Standard).

Changes in the Present Value of the Obligation and in the Fair Value of the Plan Assets

The first step is to summarise the changes in the present value of the obligation and in the fair value of the plan assets and use this to determine the amount of the actuarial gains or losses for the period. These are as follows:

(Amount in Rs.)
20X4-X5 20X5-X6 20X6-X7
Present value of obligation, 1 April 1,000 1,141 1,197
Interest cost 100 103 96
Current service cost 130 140 150
Past service cost - (non vested benefits - 30 -
Past service cost - (vested benefits) - 50 -
Benefits paid (150) (180) (190)
Actuarial (gain) loss on obligation (balancing figure) 61 (87) 42
Present value of obligation, 31 March 1,141 1,197 1,295
Fair value of plan assets, 1 April 1,000 1,092 1,109
Expected return on plan assets 120 121 114
Contributions 90 100 110
Benefits paid (150) (180) (190)
Actuarial gain (loss) on plan assets (balancing figure) 32 (24) (50)
Fair value of plan assets, 31 March 1,092 1,109 1,093
Total actuarial gain (loss) to be recognised immediately as per the Standard (29) 63 (92)

Amounts Recognised in the Balance Sheet and Statements of Profit and Loss, and Related Analyses

The final step is to determine the amounts to be recognised in the balance sheet and statement of profit and loss, and the related analyses to be disclosed in accordance with paragraphs 120 (f), (g) and (j) of the Standard (the analyses required to be disclosed in accordance with paragraph 120(c) and (e) are given in the section of this Illustration ‘Changes in the Present Value of the Obligation and in the Fair Value of the Plan Assets’). These are as follows:

(Amount in Rs.)
20X4-X5 20X5-X6 20X6-X7
Present value of the obligation 1,141 1,197 1,295
Fair value of plan assets (1,092) (1,109) (1,093)
49 88 202
Unrecognised past service cost - non vested benefits - (20) (10)
Liability recognised in balance sheet 49 68 92
Current service cost 130 140 150
Interest cost 100 103 96
Expected return on plan assets (120) (121) (114)
Net actuarial (gain) loss recognised in year 29 (63) 92
Past service cost - non-vested benefits - 10 10
Past service cost - vested benefits - 50 -
Expense recognised in the statement of profit and loss 139 119 234
Actual return on plan assets: Expected return on plan assets 120 121 114
Actuarial gain (loss) on plan assets 32 (24) (50)
Actual return on plan assets 152 97 64

Note: see example illustrating paragraphs 103-105 for presentation of reimbursements.

Illustration II

Illustrative Disclosures

This illustration is illustrative only and does not form part of the Standard. The purpose of this illustration is to illustrate the application of the Standard to assist in clarifying its meaning. Extracts from notes to the financial statements show how the required disclosures may be aggregated in the case of a large multi- national group that provides a variety of employee benefits. These extracts do not necessarily provide all the information required under the disclosure and presentation requirements of AS 15 and other Accounting Standards. In particular, they do not illustrate the disclosure of:

Employee Benefit Obligations

The amounts (in Rs.) recognised in the balance sheet are as follows:

Defined benefit Pension plans Post-employment Medical benefits
20X5-X6 20X4-X5 20X5-X6 20X4-X5
Present value of funded obligations 20,300 17,400 - -
Fair value of plan assets 18,420 17,280 - -
1,880 120 - -
Present value of unfunded obligations 2000 1000 7,337 6,405
Present value of unfunded obligations 2000 1000 7,337 6,405
Unrecognised past service cos (450) (650)
Net liability 3,430 470 7,337 6,405
Amounts in the balance sheet: Liabilities 3,430 560 7,337 6,405
Assets - (90) - -
Net liability 3,430 470 7,337 6,405

The pension plan assets include equity shares issued by [name of reporting enterprise] with a fair value of Rs. 317 (20X4-X5: Rs. 281). Plan assets also include property occupied by [name of reporting enterprise] with a fair value of Rs. 200 (20X4-X5: Rs. 185).

The amounts (in Rs.) recognised in the statement of profit and loss are as follows:

Defined benefit Pension plans Post-employment Medical benefits
20X5-X6 20X4-X5 20X5-X6 20X4-X5
Current service cost 850 750 479 411
Interest on obligation 950 1,000 803 705
Expected return on plan assets (900) (650)
Net actuarial losses (gains) recognised in year 2,650 (650) 250 400
Past service cost 200 200 - -
Losses (gains) on curtailments and settlements 175 (390) - -
Total, included in 'employee benefit expense'
3,925
260
1,532
1,516
Actual return on plan assets
600
2,250
-
-

Changes in the present value of the defined benefit obligation representing reconciliation of opening and closing balances thereof are as follows:

Defined benefit
Pension plans
Post-employment
Medical benefits
20X5-X6 20X4-X5 20X5-X6 20X4-X5
Opening defined benefit obligation 18,400 11,600 6,405 5,439
Service cost 850 750 479 411
Interest cost 950 1,000 803 705
Actuarial losses (gains) 2,350 950 250 400
Losses (gains) on curtailments (500) -
Liabilities extinguished on settlements - (350)
Liabilities assumed in an amalgamation in the nature of purchase - 5,000
Exchange differences on foreign plans 900 (150)
Benefits paid (650) (400) (600) (550)
Closing defined benefit obligation 22,300 18,400 7,7337 6,405

Changes in the fair value of plan assets representing reconciliation of the opening and closing balances thereof are as follows:

Defined benefit Pension plans
20X5-X6 20X4-X5
Opening fair value of plan assets 17,280 9,200
Expected return 900 650
Actuarial gains and (losses) (300) 1,600
Assets distributed on settlements (400) -
Contributions by employer 700 350
Assets acquired in an amalgamation in the nature of purchas - 6,000
Exchange differences on foreign plans 890 (120)
Benefits paid (650) (400)
18,420 17,280

The Group expects to contribute Rs. 900 to its defined benefit pension plans in 20X6-X7.

The major categories of plan assets as a percentage of total plan assets are as follows:

Defined benefit Pension plans Post-employment Medical benefits
20X5-X6 20X4-X5 20X5-X6 20X4-X5
Government of India Securities 80% 82% 78% 81%
High quality corporate bonds 11% 10% 12% 12%
Equity shares of listed companies 4% 3% 10% 7%
Property 5% 5% - -
Principal actuarial assumptions at the balance sheet date (expressed as weighted averages):
20X5-X6 20X4-X5
Discount rate at 31 March 5.0% 6.5%
Expected return on plan assets at 31 March 5.4% 7.0%
Proportion of employees opting for early retirement 30% 30%
Annual increase in healthcare costs 8% 8%
Future changes in maximum state health care benefits 3% 3%

The estimates of future salary increases, considered in actuarial valuation, take account of inflation, seniority, promotion and other relevant factors, such as supply and demand in the employment market.

Assumed healthcare cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts recognised in the statement of profit and loss. At present, healthcare costs, as indicated in the principal actuarial assumption given above, are expected to increase at 8% p.a. A one percentage point change in assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have the following effects on the aggregate of the service cost and interest cost and defined benefit obligation:

one percentage point increase one percentage point decrease
Effect on the aggregate of the service cost and interest cost 190 (150)
Effect on defined benefit obligation 1,000 (900)

Amounts for the current and previous four periods are as follows:

20X5-X6 20X4-X5 20X3-X4 20X2-X3 20X1-X2
Defined benefit pension plans
Defined benefit obligation (22,300) (18,400) (11,600) (10,582) (9,144)
Plan assets 18,420 17,280 9,200 8,502 10,000
Surplus/(deficit) (3,880) (1,120) (2,400) (2,080) 856
Experience adjustments on plan liabilities (1,111) (768) (69) 543 (642)
Experience adjustments (300) 1,600 (1,078) (2,890) 2,777
on plan assets Post-employment medical benefits ---
20X5-X6 20X4-X5 20X3-X4 20X2-X3 20X1-X2
Defined benefit Obligation 7,337 6,405 5,439 4,923 4,221
Experience adjustments on plan liabilities (232) 829 490 (174) (103)

The group also participates in an industry-wide defined benefit plan which provides pensions linked to final salaries and is funded in a manner such that contributions are set at a level that is expected to be sufficient to pay the benefits falling due in the same period. It is not practicable to determine the present value of the group’s obligation or the related current service cost as the plan computes its obligations on a basis that differs materially from the basis used in [name of reporting enterprise]’s financial statements. [describe basis] On that basis, the plan’s financial statements to 30 September 20X3 show an unfunded liability of Rs. 27,525. The unfunded liability will result in future payments by participating employers. The plan has approximately 75,000 members, of whom approximately 5,000 are current or former employees of [name of reporting enterprise] or their dependants. The expense recognised in the statement of profit and loss, which is equal to contributions due for the year, and is not included in the above amounts, was Rs. 230 (20X4-X5: Rs. 215). The group’s future contributions may be increased substantially if other enterprises withdraw from the plan.

Footnotes

* Originally issued in 1995 and titled as ‘Accounting for Retirement Benefits in the Financial Statements of Employers’. AS 15 (revised 2005) was originally published in the March 2005 issue of the Institute’s Journal. Subsequently, the Institute, in January 2006, made a Limited Revision to AS 15 (revised 2005) primarily with a view to bring the disclosure requirements of the standard relating to the defined benefit plans in line with the corresponding International Accounting Standard (IAS) 19, Employee Benefits; to clarify the application of the transitional provisions; and to provide relaxation/ exemptions to the Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). Thereafter, another Limited Revision to AS 15 (revised 2005) was made primarily with a view to provide an option to an entity to charge additional liability arising upon the first application of the standard as an expense over a period up to five years with a disclosure of unrecognised amount. An entity was allowed to exercise this option only during the first accounting year commencing on or after 7th December 2006. These Limited Revisions have been duly incorporated in AS 15 (revised 2005). The Standard was earlier notified as part of Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006, under Companies Act, 1956. The Standard has been notified as part of Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2021, under Companies Act, 2013.

1Attention is specifically drawn to paragraph 4.3 of the Preface, according to which accounting standards are intended to apply only to items which are material.

2The accounting for such benefits is dealt with in the Guidance Note on Accounting for Employee Share-based Payments issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

3For applicability of paragraphs 50 to 116 to Small and Medium-sized Companies and Micro, Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, refer to the provisos appearing after paragraph 116.

4Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, inserted the following footnote in Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2021, under Companies Act, 2013, which is relevant for companies:

“Transitional Provisions given in Paragraphs 142A-146 are relevant only for standards notified under Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006, as amended from time to time.”

Quick Links